Za Otlichiye
Signifer
Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021 Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
|
Posté le: Lun Oct 25, 2021 5:45 pm Sujet du message: |
|
A charge might fall short. And you know in step 3 whether all initial targets are going to evade or not. So steps 5, 6, and 7 are taking place before step 4. That's the problem. |
|
Za Otlichiye
Signifer
Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021 Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
|
Posté le: Lun Oct 25, 2021 8:39 pm Sujet du message: |
|
There is an obscure asymmetry in the process.
If no one evades, then there are no secondary targets to strike.
If everyone evades then you must charge the minimum distance, but otherwise decide whether or not to strike secondary targtes.
But if an initial target does not evade, you must strike all the secondary targets.
Doubt you can take advantage of this tactically, but it is odd |
|
Dickstick
Légat
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016 Messages: 682
Localisation: West Bromwich
|
Posté le: Lun Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Za Otlichiye a écrit: |
If no one evades, then there are no secondary targets to strike.
But if an initial target does not evade, you must strike all the secondary targets.
|
These contradict each other.
Just delete the second.
Edit.
Missed the "an" sorry.
But then change "must" to May & "all" to any/all. _________________ Player 747 don't call me Jumbo
Dernière édition par Dickstick le Mar Oct 26, 2021 5:27 pm; édité 1 fois |
|
Za Otlichiye
Signifer
Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021 Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
|
Posté le: Lun Oct 25, 2021 10:54 pm Sujet du message: |
|
If some evade but at least one does not...
I don't think this would confuse anyone that reread page 43 as preparation for commenting on this thread, but who knows?
(BTW since I've broached the subject, have you reread page 41 and do you have any second thoughts?) |
|
Dickstick
Légat
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016 Messages: 682
Localisation: West Bromwich
|
Posté le: Mar Oct 26, 2021 5:32 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Za Otlichiye a écrit: | If some evade but at least one does not...
I don't think this would confuse anyone that reread page 43 as preparation for commenting on this thread, but who knows?
(BTW since I've broached the subject, have you reread page 41 and do you have any second thoughts?) |
P41 reads the same as it does in v3 p51
I've seen no problems with it since 2014. _________________ Player 747 don't call me Jumbo |
|