Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
Adjusting positions and exiting ZoC
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Auteur Message
Dickstick
Légat


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016
Messages: 682
Localisation: West Bromwich
MessagePosté le: Lun Nov 08, 2021 11:20 pm    Sujet du message: Adjusting positions and exiting ZoC Répondre en citant
I have a swordsman behind and in group contact with a bowman.
The bowman has a cavalry move up into ZoC.

Does it shoot its way out of trouble or Evade?
Where does an evade get us?

Using 2 cp it moves back 1ud and takes a disorder as per p37.
Expensive but could be worse being ridden down by cavalry.

Now what's the swordsman doing while this is going on?
It's been interpenetrated but not fully crossed so its position has to be adjusted p39 bullet 3. It seems to me it is pushed forward to the original position of the bowman as this is the minimum necessary to clear the bowman base.

Have I got this correct?
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1546
MessagePosté le: Lun Nov 08, 2021 11:54 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
SwBW_CV

IF I understand it is the above. CV is an enemy
Bow do not evade so I am not quite getting your point.

The BW back up 1 UD, but this is not far enough to clear the SW. So the sword are displaced to their rear. So you have not done much.

in the bullet 3 you cite it reads "moved back or pushed". So in this case the Sw would not be pushed forward.

The pushed/displaced unit is never* going to move forward.

*Never from memory not looking at rules.


practically the Sw should slide and move up so when the CV charge the BW (bow will get a shot off this turn) the Sw will then have a flank attack next turn after offering support.

The obvious is the Sw advance through the bow but do not contact the CV and if necessary the BW get moved backwards.


All the above and I admit I may not follow correctly.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Dickstick
Légat


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016
Messages: 682
Localisation: West Bromwich
MessagePosté le: Mar Nov 09, 2021 8:43 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
The bowman was in a line of HI swordsmen having replaced the HI swordsmen that was now behind.
Cavalry (enemy naturally, as one does not ZoC ones own troops) come up and ZoC the line.

Only way for the bow to exit the ZoC is to evade so looking at p37, units that cannot evade, bullet 2, we have the bowmans move.

For the HI swordsmen p39 adjusting position bullet 3 we have.
In other cases the crossed unit is moved back OR pushed the minimum necessary to make room for the crossing unit.

2/3 forward is shorter than 1 ud backwards.
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
fdunadan
Tribun


Inscrit le: 12 Juin 2009
Messages: 978
MessagePosté le: Mar Nov 09, 2021 4:39 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
You'd better charge the Cav(if not impact) with your HI.
If you stay and the Cav is alone, it will be overlapped on two sides in fight. Unlikely to win, especially after being shoot at.

Exiting ZoC must be reserved for very extreme situation and this seems not to be one.
_________________
Audentes fortuna iuvat.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Za Otlichiye
Signifer


Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021
Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
MessagePosté le: Mar Nov 09, 2021 6:39 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Looks fine to me, given they are heavy swordsmen. They will end up 10mm (or 20mm) short of the bowmen's original position.
If they were medium, then they cannot be partially crossed, so the bowmen cannot interpenetrate, so I think they are stuck. IIUC they cannot push back the swordsmen.

The swordsmen could move forward through the bowmen, avoiding the Disorder penalty, IIUC.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Snowhitsky
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2015
Messages: 224
Localisation: Lancaster, UK
MessagePosté le: Mar Nov 09, 2021 6:42 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Hmmm, i am actually with Dickstick on this one.

It does say “the crossed unit is moved back or pushed the minimum necessary to make room for the crossing unitâ€.

It does not say “the crossed unit is moved back to its own rearâ€.

My reading is the crossed unit moves in the opposite direction of the crossing unit so the HI get shunted forwards towards the CV. The HI cannot then move.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Mar Nov 09, 2021 11:17 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Agreed. Where the LMI bow are supported by MI sw, no interpenetration is possible because the 1UD rearwards movement is insufficient to "at least partially reach the other side".

Where they are supported by HI sw, the LMI bow move back 1UD effectively swapping places with the HI sw.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Zoltan
Centurion


Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015
Messages: 445
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
MessagePosté le: Mer Nov 10, 2021 7:45 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
And if the HI are mounted on a 40x40 base for aesthetic reasons does this change anything?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Dickstick
Légat


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016
Messages: 682
Localisation: West Bromwich
MessagePosté le: Mer Nov 10, 2021 8:01 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Zoltan a écrit:
And if the HI are mounted on a 40x40 base for aesthetic reasons does this change anything?


See p7 basing 3rd paragraph.
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mike Bennett
Centurion


Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017
Messages: 497
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
MessagePosté le: Mer Nov 10, 2021 11:36 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Ramses II a écrit:
Agreed. Where the LMI bow are supported by MI sw, no interpenetration is possible because the 1UD rearwards movement is insufficient to "at least partially reach the other side"..


If the 2 edges are coincident then surely the bow front edge has “reached†the sword rear edge, although i agree it has not passed beyond
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Jeu Nov 11, 2021 5:25 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I see where you are coming from, Mike, but since this is in the context of passing through the friends, I would say that means the unit must “pass beyond†as you put it.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum