Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
Charging
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules questions V3
Auteur Message
stuuk
Gladiateur


Inscrit le: 21 Déc 2014
Messages: 32
MessagePosté le: Dim Fév 15, 2015 12:39 pm    Sujet du message: Charging Répondre en citant
Am I missing a rule or is it really possible to turn and charge?

So for example, I turn a stand 180 degrees and charge a unit behind me?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Commodore
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2012
Messages: 1195
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Dim Fév 15, 2015 1:07 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Correct !
_________________
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead"
Cdr Farragut,Mobile 1864
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Soranon
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 19 Juil 2012
Messages: 2640
Localisation: Toulouse
MessagePosté le: Dim Fév 15, 2015 1:09 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Yes you can !

At the begining of a charge, a unit can do one of this (p36 in french rule):

- A wheel
- A shift
- A turn (with a wheel)

Unit can't never turn and shift (p28)
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
stuuk
Gladiateur


Inscrit le: 21 Déc 2014
Messages: 32
MessagePosté le: Lun Fév 16, 2015 6:51 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Thanks guys.

And when you charge as a group, if one unit would overlap (support) against an enemy unit, I can choose for the supporting unit to move past the enemy front and end, say side to side - correct?
(of course, only if the supporting unit is not itself in front to front contact with the enemy)

(in order to setup a flank charge next friendly bound)
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mad Max
Centurion


Inscrit le: 17 Fév 2014
Messages: 469
Localisation: Béthune
MessagePosté le: Lun Fév 16, 2015 8:41 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
stuuk a écrit:
Thanks guys.

And when you charge as a group, if one unit would overlap (support) against an enemy unit, I can choose for the supporting unit to move past the enemy front and end, say side to side - correct?
(of course, only if the supporting unit is not itself in front to front contact with the enemy)

(in order to setup a flank charge next friendly bound)



Not possible as a group move.
If you move this supporting unit on its own, then it's ok.
_________________
Maxime, Ch'tis Stratège de l'Artois
pas vraiment ch'ti, pas vraiment stratège, pas vraiment amateur d'art non plus
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mad Max
Centurion


Inscrit le: 17 Fév 2014
Messages: 469
Localisation: Béthune
MessagePosté le: Lun Fév 16, 2015 8:41 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
stuuk a écrit:
Thanks guys.

And when you charge as a group, if one unit would overlap (support) against an enemy unit, I can choose for the supporting unit to move past the enemy front and end, say side to side - correct?
(of course, only if the supporting unit is not itself in front to front contact with the enemy)

(in order to setup a flank charge next friendly bound)



Not possible as a group move.
If you move this supporting unit on its own, then it's ok.
_________________
Maxime, Ch'tis Stratège de l'Artois
pas vraiment ch'ti, pas vraiment stratège, pas vraiment amateur d'art non plus
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mad Max
Centurion


Inscrit le: 17 Fév 2014
Messages: 469
Localisation: Béthune
MessagePosté le: Lun Fév 16, 2015 8:45 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Mind you: you can support this overlapping unit with another unit for the same cost.

About u-turning and charging, don't forget that it takes 2 cp and 2 mp for some units just for the u-turn
_________________
Maxime, Ch'tis Stratège de l'Artois
pas vraiment ch'ti, pas vraiment stratège, pas vraiment amateur d'art non plus
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
stuuk
Gladiateur


Inscrit le: 21 Déc 2014
Messages: 32
MessagePosté le: Lun Fév 16, 2015 9:15 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Not that I want it to be possible (I think it would be a bad rule) but where does it say in the book it cannot be done?


I am considering pitching the game to serial FoG players but this puts me off, as does the charge in any direction rule.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Longtooth
Signifer


Inscrit le: 14 Oct 2014
Messages: 349
Localisation: Oxford
MessagePosté le: Mar Fév 17, 2015 5:53 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Page 36 (Continuing a charge) says that "once the units are in contact with an enemy, thy must each conform (see page 52)".

Flipping through to page 52, we see that "after initial contact is made, the unit continues to move by sliding and/or wheeling up to one UD in order to align corner to corner with the enemy most in front.....in the case of front or flank contact, the unit must be aligned with its front corner against the enemy's front corner".

The 360 charge rule is different to most ancient / medieval rule sets but does not make the game any less interesting to play.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
stuuk
Gladiateur


Inscrit le: 21 Déc 2014
Messages: 32
MessagePosté le: Mar Fév 17, 2015 10:22 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Ah yeah, good catch. Thanks Smile

"The 360 charge rule is different to most ancient / medieval rule sets but does not make the game any less interesting to play."

No, I agree.

The thing that concerns me is that is seems extremely easy to flank opposing elements, which turns it in to a game of flanking. It's good that you cannot line up a flank attack on the charge (because you have to get behind their front edge)
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
ethan
Signifer


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 347
MessagePosté le: Mar Fév 17, 2015 1:29 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
The way we are thinking about it is this:

In other games (FoG, DBM notably) the bias is that it is difficult to flank people. When playing if it looks hard to flank someone, you probably can't do it.

In ADLG the bias is that it is easy to flank attack. If you have a free unit close to someone's flank you can probably do it.

This caught us out several times when we were first playing, but we have come around to this rule. It makes the game more decisive, it reduces "clever" play to frustrate the opponent, and when you have broken through someone's flank and have more troops there than they have you can do a lot of damage.

In DBM a good players could often use N-1 or N-2 bases to seriously frustrate the ability of someone with N bases to attack the flank of a formation. In ADLG the N-1 bases (much less N-2) have much less ability to do this.

There is a flip side, in ADLG someone will rarely (if ever) get a flank attack opportunity before you are able to respond. As long as you have troops to fight with you can probably protect your flank. But if you reach a point that someone has a base behind your front line, close to your formation, with no fewer defenders than attackers in the area - you are going to get hit in the flank.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
stuuk
Gladiateur


Inscrit le: 21 Déc 2014
Messages: 32
MessagePosté le: Mar Fév 17, 2015 3:18 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
That seems a pretty accurate description yes.

We've found that when outnumbered it's very easy to be flanked, which is logical but it does tend to mean that many poor troops can often get the better of fewer, better, troops.

It is entirely possible we are playing badly of course - reserves are required in order to project ZOCs, and we have a current tendency to commit everything..


Another query - the +1 for fighting the flank of an enemy.
Does that only apply to the main unit if it is attacking the flank of an enemy?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
lionelrus
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009
Messages: 4709
Localisation: paris
MessagePosté le: Mar Fév 17, 2015 3:37 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
ethan a écrit:
In ADLG the bias is that it is easy to flank attack. If you have a free unit close to someone's flank you can probably do it.

.

It's not true
_________________
"Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Longtooth
Signifer


Inscrit le: 14 Oct 2014
Messages: 349
Localisation: Oxford
MessagePosté le: Mar Fév 17, 2015 8:54 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Stuuk,

You get +1 for flank attack regardless of whether the flanking unit is the only element in contact. In this sense, it is similar to the +1 bonus for side overlap (although you cannot claim +1 for overlap and +1 for flank on the same flank).
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules questions V3
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum