Auteur |
Message |
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4718
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Sam Jan 08, 2022 5:51 pm Sujet du message: |
|
If all units are taken alone, and general is ordinary, MC1 to Mc4, and LC1to LC3 are in command range. _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Sam Jan 08, 2022 7:17 pm Sujet du message: |
|
lionelrus a écrit: | If all units are taken alone, and general is ordinary, MC1 to Mc4, and LC1to LC3 are in command range. | I do not think this is correct Lionel, but would be interested in knowing the French text for Command Range, (P26)
The English text is Citation: | Command range
A commander sends his orders by signals or messengers. Units or group must be in command range from their commander: | The key word here is "in", and it would be good to have the French text for completeness.
The point in question is that elsewhere in the rules, the definitions for ZoC, Shooting, Operational zone etc all state that units must be "within" (dedans) the specified distance. Consequently here I believe that to be 'in command range', the units must be within 4UD / 8UD. So the fact that there are four / eight intervening units means that MC4 and LC4 are actually out of command range. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4718
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Sam Jan 08, 2022 8:18 pm Sujet du message: |
|
In France, we usely consider if you take a 4 Ud long wand and you touch the chef by an end and the tropp by the other, you are in range. This concerns command and shooting range. About Zoc, it's clearly written somewhere it's less than 1UD. _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Mike Bennett
Centurion
Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017 Messages: 497
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
|
Posté le: Sam Jan 08, 2022 8:34 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Ramses II a écrit: |
The point in question is that elsewhere in the rules, the definitions for ZoC, Shooting, Operational zone etc all state that units must be "within" (dedans) the specified distance. Consequently here I believe that to be 'in command range', the units must be within 4UD / 8UD. So the fact that there are four / eight intervening units means that MC4 and LC4 are actually out of command range. |
Is that consistent with tactical zone and Shooting range? Currently cavalry can march and stop at 4UD from an enemy. If bow armed that enemy can shoot at them and in their next turn they can charge. All done at exactly 4UD. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
ALEXANDER
Vétéran
Inscrit le: 28 Déc 2021 Messages: 171
|
Posté le: Sam Jan 08, 2022 8:52 pm Sujet du message: |
|
There is not just the word in.
In and up to is used to to describe beeing in command range
..and out to describe the opposite.
There is no at.
Citation: | Range measurement
● 6
If a unit is out of command |
and
Citation: |
Light troops
...for example a brillant general can order light horse
up to 16 UD ....
|
|
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Sam Jan 08, 2022 9:04 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Ok, I think it will be simpler to check with "the oracle" . . . . |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4718
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Sam Jan 08, 2022 10:17 pm Sujet du message: |
|
lionelrus a écrit: | In France, we usely consider if you take a 4 Ud long wand and you touch the chef by an end and the tropp by the other, you are in range. This concerns command and shooting range. About Zoc, it's clearly written somewhere it's less than 1UD. |
So, i contredict myself: all are in command range. _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ballista
Légionaire
Inscrit le: 15 Jan 2018 Messages: 120
|
Posté le: Dim Jan 09, 2022 6:44 am Sujet du message: |
|
Finally might have a sane answer
This was starting to sound like a sketch from Monty Python and I thinking which one you was John Cleese in disguise |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4718
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Dim Jan 09, 2022 10:02 pm Sujet du message: |
|
It's hard answering a question on a point never seen in game.
At first, included generals are NEVER placed in a end of a line, too much dangerous.
Secondly, players moves their troops in group as often as possible.
usualy, i so don't answer this kinds of questions, i do prefer wait the situation coming in game, as it never occur i'm relax. _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
ALEXANDER
Vétéran
Inscrit le: 28 Déc 2021 Messages: 171
|
Posté le: Lun Jan 10, 2022 11:57 am Sujet du message: |
|
I think the question was justified. After all, there seemed to has been a great uncertainty about this.
I am glad that we have now clarified this question.
Imagine this discussion starts at a tournement
One should also consider the further consequences of a different decision.
For example
If HC impetuous would have advanced 4 UD and the attached ordinary general on their rear would have stayed in place,
... the Heavy cavalry would have been out of command range already after their first move.
Final Conclusion
M5 and LC4 are in command range
as the distance is exactly 4 UD and 8 UD
Dernière édition par ALEXANDER le Lun Jan 10, 2022 12:44 pm; édité 1 fois |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4718
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Lun Jan 10, 2022 12:21 pm Sujet du message: |
|
ALEXANDER a écrit: |
If HC impetuous would have advanced 4 UD and the attached ordinary general on their rear would have stayed in place,
... the Heavy cavalry would have been out of command range already after their first move.
|
And Why the HC would have move and their commander stay in place? If HC are alone, he would have move with them, if not he would have joins another tropps in his command... _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Lun Jan 10, 2022 4:34 pm Sujet du message: |
|
OK guys and gals, here is the official response
For range measurements (movement, command) and shooting, the distance can be the exact value.
So if a commander has a command range of 4 UD, he commands a unit that is exactly at 4 UD from him.
For example, where there is an ordinary commander included in a group of six units, OABCDE, E is in command range of O.
The same is true for movement range or shooting ranges : when you move or shoot 4 UD, you can move or shoot up to 4 UD. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Zoltan
Centurion
Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015 Messages: 445
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Posté le: Lun Jan 10, 2022 6:38 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Thanks Ramses. And so to be absolutely clear, what you have said above does NOT apply to ZoC. An enemy unit at precisely 1 UD from the enemy is NOT within the enemy’s ZoC?
To be constrained by an enemy ZoC you must be within (at less than) 1 UD. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Lun Jan 10, 2022 11:38 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Zoltan a écrit: | Thanks Ramses. And so to be absolutely clear, what you have said above does NOT apply to ZoC. An enemy unit at precisely 1 UD from the enemy is NOT within the enemy’s ZoC?
To be constrained by an enemy ZoC you must be within (at less than) 1 UD. | Correct
(See ZoC definition P35 1st BP) |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Za Otlichiye
Signifer
Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021 Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
|
Posté le: Lun Jan 10, 2022 11:46 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Just noticed the title of this thread is misspelled. This isn't a "Rage", it's a "Rave"! |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|