Art De La Guerre

The flanking Cavalry Unit could charge the Pike, this would then nullify the Pike ZOC thus allowing the other Cavalry Units to move freely.

So if the enemy X is Heavy Spearmen, are all the points correct?

I am still struggling to clearly understand the Disengagement rules-

X
ABC

X = Enemy Heavy Cavalry
A = Light Cavalry Bow
B = Heavy Cavalry Bow
C = Medium Knight Impetuous

The Light Ho ...

Yes, when Units Disengage they don't turn.......but what about any Units _not_ in Combat that wish to move back as part of a group with Units that _are_ Disengaging?

This then poses the problem that only Light Cavalry and Light Infantry can turn twice in a single move, therefore troops not in combat would only be able to participate in a group Disengagement move i ...

From what I am seeing 90+% of people have been playing with the simple protocol that the rear follows and is not blocked.

And each specific example ruled on by Herve has supported this protocol, ye ...

How is Herve's response the opposite to what I am saying, when he expressly permits the move!?!

[Maybe read what Hervé wrote instead of inventing your own "rule"

Dave]

Herve has been consistent with the last bullet in the Wheel section on page 31.

This being that the part ...

https://rodwargaming.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/diagram-4.jpg

As can be seen in the above image the rear ranks do not jump out to the left as they complete their wheel.

What is so hard to understand about Herve's common sense ruling?

The troops are simply following the troops in front, they don't teleport out to the side because our figures are based on fixed rec ...

After not really getting any consensus on my first Disengagement question, here is a second one-

XX
AB

X = Two Heavy Infantry
A = Light Horse
B = Heavy Cavalry

A and B form a group and wis ...

Disengaging

X
AB

X = Heavy Swordsmen
A+B = 2 Units of Light Cavalry

The Light Cavalry wish to Disengage with a group move, however the rules say only a Unit in Melee or Melee Support can Di ...