Auteur |
Message |
Sujet: Extension/Contractions and Charges |
SteveR
Réponses: 19
Vus: 385
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Avr 29, 2024 5:18 pm Sujet: Extension/Contractions and Charges |
Thanks Dan, you're giving me too much credit when you say I am remembering something.
But let me make sure I understand though.
Bullet 1 under page 43 charge movement allows a unit or group to w ... |
Sujet: Extension/Contractions and Charges |
SteveR
Réponses: 19
Vus: 385
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Avr 29, 2024 4:12 pm Sujet: Extension/Contractions and Charges |
I remain unconvinced
What I *thought* bullet 5 covered was the situation where the lead unit in a column was in combat. A unit in melee may still perform an extension when the lead unit is in co ... |
Sujet: Extension/Contractions and Charges |
SteveR
Réponses: 19
Vus: 385
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Avr 29, 2024 3:10 am Sujet: Extension/Contractions and Charges |
I had always read that bullet literally.
In that if an expansion brings units into contact it counts as a charge. Or if a contraction (which is performed by moving straight ahead per page) bring ... |
Sujet: Army Design Philosopy |
SteveR
Réponses: 7
Vus: 1419
|
Forum: Army lists Posté le: Lun Avr 01, 2024 4:01 pm Sujet: Army Design Philosopy |
I struggle with small command design
Ideally I would like it to be 4 units. Flexible. So it can ambush as a single group or act as a flank march.
I've done this with Siamese - 1 El, two escort ... |
Sujet: Army Design Philosopy |
SteveR
Réponses: 7
Vus: 1419
|
Forum: Army lists Posté le: Dim Mar 31, 2024 4:12 pm Sujet: Army Design Philosopy |
Good points.
I did not play much DBM but did play a lot of DBR and agree with you that I made much more use of single purpose commands in that set.
Many armies I used were highly homogeneous a ... |
Sujet: Evade move blocked and reorientation |
SteveR
Réponses: 2
Vus: 109
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Mar 29, 2024 8:58 pm Sujet: Evade move blocked and reorientation |
Thank you Dan,
Exactly. I wondered if this was the case.
The turn happens in step 1 of the evade procedure. And after doing step 1, step 2 is where you check to see if the evade is cancelled o ... |
Sujet: Evade move blocked and reorientation |
SteveR
Réponses: 2
Vus: 109
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Mar 29, 2024 4:24 pm Sujet: Evade move blocked and reorientation |
So I had a funny one happen yesterday
Two units each 1 UD by 1 UD were fighting.
My opponent had a unit of LI in simple support. The fight was in the open.
Like this
1
23
1 is facin ... |
Sujet: Army Design Philosopy |
SteveR
Réponses: 7
Vus: 1419
|
Forum: Army lists Posté le: Dim Mar 24, 2024 4:21 pm Sujet: Army Design Philosopy |
sorry - missed the end quote
only this was Dan
I have a habit of designing armies with Corps A: Mounted. Corps B: Foot. Corps C: mix of each and best commander. This gives me flexibility in depl ... |
Sujet: Army Design Philosopy |
SteveR
Réponses: 7
Vus: 1419
|
Forum: Army lists Posté le: Dim Mar 24, 2024 4:20 pm Sujet: Army Design Philosopy |
In a discussion over on the rules forum Dan Hazelwood wrote
I have a habit of designing armies with Corps A: Mounted. Corps B: Foot. Corps C: mix of each and best commander. This gives me flexibil ... |
Sujet: Expendable Levy |
SteveR
Réponses: 18
Vus: 491
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Dim Mar 24, 2024 4:09 pm Sujet: Expendable Levy |
Perhaps the way to look at this is that my case is only even possible if the enemy unit concerned is not mounted on a 1 UD by 1 UD base. Given that one principle of the rules is that is how the autho ... |
Sujet: Expendable Levy |
SteveR
Réponses: 18
Vus: 491
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Dim Mar 24, 2024 2:56 am Sujet: Expendable Levy |
Yep, absolutely agree - the "oops, someone seems to have moved sideways into combat with the levy..." scenario for me would probably fall into the bucket of "That's actually quite funny ... |
Sujet: Expendable Levy |
SteveR
Réponses: 18
Vus: 491
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Sam Mar 23, 2024 9:21 pm Sujet: Expendable Levy |
Tim, as always, thank you for your consideration of the matter.
Page 42 under ambiguous confirmation covers the common case where a mounted unit is charging a foot unit which is partially located i ... |
Sujet: Expendable Levy |
SteveR
Réponses: 18
Vus: 491
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Sam Mar 23, 2024 11:38 am Sujet: Expendable Levy |
Hi Mark,
I certainly agree with you on the first point.
Regarding the second, they may never move into position of support. Â But their move is not into a position of support. Â
When they mo ... |
Sujet: Expendable Levy |
SteveR
Réponses: 18
Vus: 491
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Sam Mar 23, 2024 3:06 am Sujet: Expendable Levy |
1. Â A unit of expendable levy is in the simple support position with a friendly unit on its flank so that it is in front corner front corner contact with the enemy.
Page 42 says it may never charg ... |
Sujet: RULES VERSION 5 |
SteveR
Réponses: 10
Vus: 1360
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mer Mar 20, 2024 4:56 am Sujet: RULES VERSION 5 |
Well, it is like this.
I agree with you on point 1. When I consider the hours of play I get from the rules I would happily buy another couple of updated copies
I'm neutral on your second reques ... |
|