Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
58 résultats trouvés
Art De La Guerre Index du Forum
Auteur Message
  Sujet: Impact cavalry evades
Korik

Réponses: 2
Vus: 2430

MessageForum: Rules questions V3   Posté le: Sam Déc 22, 2018 12:12 am   Sujet: Impact cavalry evades
If impact heavy cavalry (ignoring bow/impact) are charged flank or rear, which removes their impact attribute, can they evade?
  Sujet: Oblique charges targetting more than one unit
Korik

Réponses: 1
Vus: 2189

MessageForum: Rules questions V3   Posté le: Sam Déc 22, 2018 12:10 am   Sujet: Oblique charges targetting more than one unit
If a charge is declared by heavier troops against light troops which do not have a ZOC is it possible to angle the charge so as to cross the bases of more than one element, thus causing multiple eleme ...
  Sujet: Double Flank Contact
Korik

Réponses: 10
Vus: 5051

MessageForum: Rules questions V3   Posté le: Sam Déc 08, 2018 6:56 pm   Sujet: Double Flank Contact
On a related point, can m choose which enemy unit to take as it's primary melee opponent, given that neither made a frontal charge?
  Sujet: Conforming - general
Korik

Réponses: 2
Vus: 1965

MessageForum: Rules questions V3   Posté le: Dim Oct 28, 2018 10:53 pm   Sujet: Conforming - general
Thanks for the clarification and the pointers
  Sujet: Interpenetrating LMI
Korik

Réponses: 9
Vus: 5697

MessageForum: Rules questions V3   Posté le: Dim Oct 28, 2018 9:07 pm   Sujet: Interpenetrating LMI
If this were a specific rule covering swordsmen swapping out with bowmen in the anticipation of hand to hand combat then fair enough, although that would suggest some cooperation between the two units ...
  Sujet: Interpenetrating LMI
Korik

Réponses: 9
Vus: 5697

MessageForum: Rules questions V3   Posté le: Dim Oct 28, 2018 12:01 am   Sujet: Interpenetrating LMI
Foot Kn/HI/MI can pass through bow/crossbow which are both LMI
In that case, why the restriction on interpenetrating javelinmem, also LMI?
And for that matter, why can’t LMI interpenetrate other L ...
  Sujet: Dispersal of Light Foot
Korik

Réponses: 9
Vus: 4703

MessageForum: Rules questions V3   Posté le: Dim Oct 14, 2018 11:38 pm   Sujet: Dispersal of Light Foot
That's quite an interesting set of circumstances

Technically, the heavier troops can't charge the LI from their initial corner to corner contact but, if the LI didn't have to make a mandatory one U ...
  Sujet: Targetting elements in overlap by corner contact
Korik

Réponses: 3
Vus: 2540

MessageForum: Rules questions V3   Posté le: Dim Oct 14, 2018 11:00 pm   Sujet: Targetting elements in overlap by corner contact
It was only a discussion point and I readily accept that the game mechanics of any set of rules are, initially at least, influenced by the preconceptions of the author (although this doesn't mean they ...
  Sujet: Targetting elements in overlap by corner contact
Korik

Réponses: 3
Vus: 2540

MessageForum: Rules questions V3   Posté le: Dim Oct 14, 2018 2:39 pm   Sujet: Targetting elements in overlap by corner contact
Page 66, 'Shooting limitations', fourth and fifth bullets state that a unit providing overlap support cannot shoot or be shot at, and also separates units into those 'engaged in melee' and those provi ...
  Sujet: Dispersal of Light Foot
Korik

Réponses: 9
Vus: 4703

MessageForum: Rules questions V3   Posté le: Dim Oct 14, 2018 2:14 pm   Sujet: Dispersal of Light Foot
Restriction on contact with LI
Q: When a unit of LI is alone in contact with a heavy unit, sometimes it is required to retreat and sometimes it must move. Is there a difference? How is this mechani ...
  Sujet: Clarification of new FAQ regarding side/side contact
Korik

Réponses: 18
Vus: 7748

MessageForum: Rules questions V3   Posté le: Dim Oct 07, 2018 10:33 pm   Sujet: Clarification of new FAQ regarding side/side contact
I presume that the first bullet in point 2 of Ramses response still requires the conforming unit to respect the rules concerning flank/rear contact?

For example, a supporting unit could continue it ...
  Sujet: Exiting the ZOC of an enemy in the unit's rear
Korik

Réponses: 7
Vus: 7610

MessageForum: Army lists   Posté le: Sam Sep 29, 2018 9:46 pm   Sujet: Exiting the ZOC of an enemy in the unit's rear
I'm happy to accept that it's a penalty, it's just sometimes dangerous to try to explain this type of rule away by reference to troop capabilities, especially when the rules cover 4,500 years of milit ...
  Sujet: Long pointy sticks v. Cavalry
Korik

Réponses: 7
Vus: 4245

MessageForum: Rules questions V3   Posté le: Sam Sep 29, 2018 9:26 pm   Sujet: Long pointy sticks v. Cavalry
Yeah, appreciate that QRF are merely aide memoires and that the main body of the rules should take precedence but this one was obviously considered of significant importance to be included in the FAQ ...
  Sujet: Exiting the ZOC of an enemy in the unit's rear
Korik

Réponses: 7
Vus: 7610

MessageForum: Army lists   Posté le: Sam Sep 29, 2018 10:27 am   Sujet: Exiting the ZOC of an enemy in the unit's rear
Any chance an admin could move this topic into the rules section please?

And sorry, don't mean to sound facetious, but pike are trained to expand from behind other troop types but not to turn 180', ...
  Sujet: Long pointy sticks v. Cavalry
Korik

Réponses: 7
Vus: 4245

MessageForum: Rules questions V3   Posté le: Sam Sep 29, 2018 10:21 am   Sujet: Long pointy sticks v. Cavalry
Which particular typo are we looking at?
 
Page 1 sur 4 Aller à la page 1, 2, 3, 4  Suivante
Toutes les heures sont au format GMT
Sauter vers: