Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
ZoC Question 2 "charging"
Page 1 sur 2 Aller à la page 1, 2  Suivante
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules questions V3
Auteur Message
daveallen
Tribun


Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016
Messages: 742
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
MessagePosté le: Lun Aoû 07, 2017 3:29 pm    Sujet du message: ZoC Question 2 "charging" Répondre en citant
Once again, page 34 "Movements allowed in a ZoC" b.p.2 says a unit in or entering a ZoC is permitted to:

Citation:
Advance, make a wheel, a quarter turn or a half turn in order to align with the most threatening enemy, move closer to it or charge it. The unit cannot end its movement being less aligned than at the beginning. The unit cannot exit the most threatening enemy's ZoC or move away from it. No point on its front edge must move further from the enemy than at the beginning of the move (except special cases below). It cannot slide except to conform just after contact.


Same situation as in the last question:



Red wants to charge in the direction of the green arrow:



Can it do so? If not why not?

Could it even declare its charge with a 90 degree wheel with the expectation that an evade by the blue Cavalry would allow it to charge a unit of Bowmen?

Dave
_________________
Putting the ink into incompetence
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
fdunadan
Tribun


Inscrit le: 12 Juin 2009
Messages: 978
MessagePosté le: Lun Aoû 07, 2017 3:53 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
No, it can't Very Happy
As Red is in the Zoc of Blue, it can't manoeuver as in open ground. The Wheel and turns are limited to achieve a better alignement withthe ZoCing enemy unit. So Red can only Wheel until its front is parrallele with the front of Blue. It can then charge straight ahead or stop moving, but it can't continue moving because of Blue's ZoC.
If there is a Bowmen on the left, they're safe as Blue's ZoC protect them...
_________________
Audentes fortuna iuvat.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
daveallen
Tribun


Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016
Messages: 742
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
MessagePosté le: Lun Aoû 07, 2017 9:19 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
fdunadan a écrit:
No, it can't Very Happy
As Red is in the Zoc of Blue, it can't manoeuver as in open ground. The Wheel and turns are limited to achieve a better alignement withthe ZoCing enemy unit. So Red can only Wheel until its front is parrallele with the front of Blue. It can then charge straight ahead or stop moving, but it can't continue moving because of Blue's ZoC.
If there is a Bowmen on the left, they're safe as Blue's ZoC protect them...

The problem here is created by the phrase:
Citation:
in order to align with the most threatening enemy, move closer to it or charge it. <my emphasis>

Does
Citation:
move closer to it or charge it
override the necessity to
Citation:
align with the most threatening enemy
?

And does the restriction
Citation:
The unit cannot end its movement being less aligned than at the beginning.

Still apply if the blue unit evades?

If it doesn't evade then the red unit will end up exactly aligned with the blue.

If it does evade there won't be a ZoC to line up in...
_________________
Putting the ink into incompetence
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
fdunadan
Tribun


Inscrit le: 12 Juin 2009
Messages: 978
MessagePosté le: Lun Aoû 07, 2017 9:28 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
When you"re in ZoC, you can:
- charge the ennemy
-align with the front of the ennemy by a Wheel or a turn
-move(straight ahead) closer to the ennemy front
in this moves can't you end being less aligned than you were at the beginning (so no 90° Wheel) nor can you exit the ZoC

The ZoC is restricting the movements so you can't just ignore it and go walzing where you want.
_________________
Audentes fortuna iuvat.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
daveallen
Tribun


Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016
Messages: 742
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
MessagePosté le: Lun Aoû 07, 2017 9:33 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
fdunadan a écrit:
When you"re in ZoC, you can:
- charge the ennemy
-align with the front of the ennemy by a Wheel or a turn
-move(straight ahead) closer to the ennemy front
in this moves can't you end being less aligned than you were at the beginning (so no 90° Wheel) nor can you exit the ZoC

The ZoC is restricting the movements so you can't just ignore it and go walzing where you want.

That was my understanding of the situation, but having it ruled against me twice at the Worlds I thought I'd better get it checked.

Especially as it seems the rule can be read differently to what you say. Embarassed

Dave
_________________
Putting the ink into incompetence
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Zoltan
Centurion


Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015
Messages: 443
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
MessagePosté le: Mar Aoû 08, 2017 5:52 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
How were you materially disadvantaged by having your understanding ruled against at the Worlds?

Did it make a material outcome to this simple, fast game?

What sneaky advantage were you trying to achieve that saw you slapped down twice?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
daveallen
Tribun


Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016
Messages: 742
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
MessagePosté le: Mar Aoû 08, 2017 6:31 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Zoltan a écrit:
How were you materially disadvantaged by having your understanding ruled against at the Worlds?

Did it make a material outcome to this simple, fast game?

What sneaky advantage were you trying to achieve that saw you slapped down twice?

How are the first two questions even remotely relevant?

Are you suggesting getting clarification of the rules is underhand?
_________________
Putting the ink into incompetence
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Dickstick
Légat


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016
Messages: 680
Localisation: West Bromwich
MessagePosté le: Mar Aoû 08, 2017 7:31 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
[quote="Zoltan"]How were you materially disadvantaged by having your understanding ruled against at the Worlds?

Did it make a material outcome to this simple, fast game?

What sneaky advantage were you trying to achieve that saw you slapped down twice?[/quote]

Now I read Dave was the victim.
Your making him out to be the perpetrator?

The sneaky one is hardly likely to ask the question, more likely to want the opposition to be ignorant.
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Zoltan
Centurion


Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015
Messages: 443
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
MessagePosté le: Mar Aoû 08, 2017 8:24 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
In the second example, why would Pink want to wheel 90 degrees (within blue's ZOC) before making contact with Blue, rather than simply charging straight ahead and contacting blue? What was Pink's motivation/purpose in wanting to make a 90 degree wheel within Blue's ZOC when a move straight ahead would achieve contact?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
daveallen
Tribun


Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016
Messages: 742
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
MessagePosté le: Mar Aoû 08, 2017 8:42 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Imagine Blue is providing support to a unit to it's left. If the Red unit is only allowed to wheel until it is parallel to blue it will remove the support when Blue evades, but no more.

If it's allowed to wheel beyond parallel it can hit the unit Blue was supporting and then conform to support its own colleague.

Also, a charge at parallel would have left it isolated and vulnerable to units behind Blue's line.

The situation was something like:


_________________
Putting the ink into incompetence
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Zoltan
Centurion


Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015
Messages: 443
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
MessagePosté le: Mer Aoû 09, 2017 5:30 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
That's a lot more info, and much better context, compared with the original post diagram.

I don't have my rule book with me but:
- because Blue will evade before Red charges, the ZOC restrictions will disappear. So Red will not be constrained by any ZOC rules when deciding how to make it's charge move
- isn't Red permitted to shift up to one base width sideways either at the start or end of the charge so that it can run down the side of the Blue unit still in contact with the other Red unit?
- Red only has to charge a minimum distance if all opponents evade. From the diagram it looks to me that if Red doesn't go its maximum charge distance it might be able to end up in side to side contact with the Blue unit still in contact to its front, and thus provide support.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
daveallen
Tribun


Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016
Messages: 742
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
MessagePosté le: Mer Aoû 09, 2017 6:35 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Now try reading my second post.

Then consider that the decision to evade comes after the declaration of the charge and its direction, not before it. So the ZoC rule can't simply be ignored in the way you suggest.
_________________
Putting the ink into incompetence
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Mer Aoû 09, 2017 2:39 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Hmm, I would suggest that the charge must be declared in a valid direction, as constrained by the rules. For example, i do not think it could be declared 90 degrees left, missing the blue unit altogether.

If the charge must comply with the rules, I suggest it must be declared due south against the unit which is ZoCing it, complying with the requirement to align with that unit. If that unit evades (as was apparently the case) then the only enemy that can be contacted must lie directly beyond the evaders, not to one side.

But this is not the first time that our views may be at variance from those of the author or French community.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
plefebvre
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 30 Déc 2009
Messages: 1166
MessagePosté le: Mer Aoû 09, 2017 4:02 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
daveallen a écrit:
Imagine Blue is providing support to a unit to it's left. If the Red unit is only allowed to wheel until it is parallel to blue it will remove the support when Blue evades, but no more.

If it's allowed to wheel beyond parallel it can hit the unit Blue was supporting and then conform to support its own colleague.

Also, a charge at parallel would have left it isolated and vulnerable to units behind Blue's line.

The situation was something like:



In such a situation red cannot wheel more than the parralele line with blue front. So if red charges and blue evades , then red cannot end in a support situation to its friend unit

The Technical Board
_________________
patrick lefebvre

"sic transit gloria mundi"
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Mer Aoû 09, 2017 4:08 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Ok, thanks. It's good to know that we agree on the answer.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules questions V3
Page 1 sur 2 Aller à la page 1, 2  Suivante
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum