Auteur |
Message |
Mark G Fry
Signifer
Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017 Messages: 337
Localisation: Bristol, UK
|
Posté le: Mer Juil 05, 2023 2:10 pm Sujet du message: Light Horse Shooting in Support Question |
|
Just checking to ensure we played this correctly the other evening.
6 x Light Horse bow - two ranks deep (so 3 base widths across) - front rank are Elite - back rank Ordinary (not that that effects the question).
There is only 1 target enemy unit (a MF unit) to the front of the whole Light Horse formation and all 3 front rank LH are within range & 'arc' (e.g. 1 UD to the side).
Were we correct that the central LH in the front rank, as the main shooter, gets +1 support from each of the two side LH bow (as these are each supported themselves -so count as a 'whole' support) as per page 59 shooting overhead, + the +1 support from the Ordinary LH to its rear.
Or - as per Page 58 (Shooting Resolution) only the 3 front rank LH bow elite + the Ordinary LH bow to the rear of the main shooter would count, as Page 58 states: "For each supporting unit (max +3) +1" ?
It only makes a +1 difference - but often that is enough to get the casualty
Many thanks
Mark |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4718
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Mer Juil 05, 2023 5:09 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Correct, you are! _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
KevinD
Légat
Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021 Messages: 501
Localisation: Texas
|
Posté le: Mer Juil 05, 2023 8:14 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Six LC firing at the enemy is -1 (LC shooting) +1 (2nd LC) +1 (3rd and 4th LC) +1 (5th and 6th LC) for a total of +2. Maybe another +1 for Elite who roll 1, 2 or 3.
Note that the front rank LC do not shoot one base width to either side, but rather 360 degrees as LC have a unique way of figuring out which units are in arc. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Neep
Légionaire
Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023 Messages: 138
|
Posté le: Mer Juil 05, 2023 9:44 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Strickly speaking, all 6 are shooting, one main from the front rank and the other five in support. As they are all LH they count 1/2 rounded up so 5/2 rounded up or +3. So total -1(LH shooting)+3(support) or +2 to an Elite boosted die. The general rule changed by a specific rule is typical of AdlG. Tread lightly. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Mark G Fry
Signifer
Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017 Messages: 337
Localisation: Bristol, UK
|
Posté le: Sam Juil 08, 2023 4:04 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Neep a écrit: | Strickly speaking, all 6 are shooting, one main from the front rank and the other five in support. As they are all LH they count 1/2 rounded up so 5/2 rounded up or +3. So total -1(LH shooting)+3(support) or +2 to an Elite boosted die. The general rule changed by a specific rule is typical of AdlG. Tread lightly. |
My/our concern was the rule (on page 58 ) that states that a single shooter can only be supported by +3 other shooters.
So the fact that in this instance there are 5 shooters supporting seemed to be wrong.
Although, the outside rear ranks are 'supporting' the front ranks that are also supporting.
Anyway ... if we played it right & I am happy to hear we did, that is a good thing.
Thanks
Mark |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
KevinD
Légat
Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021 Messages: 501
Localisation: Texas
|
Posté le: Sam Juil 08, 2023 10:17 pm Sujet du message: |
|
The max support is +3, not 3 units.
The rules on p 58 say that max (modifier);is “+3†- clearly this +3 refers to a modifier and not number of modifying units as you can speak about +3 to a modifier not would not refer to 3 modifying units as +3, you would say 3 units instead.
Thus to me it is clear that 5 of more light units firing in support give the primary shooter a +3 modifier.
I would also refer you to page 59 where it discusses four supporting light units (although admittedly not five or more such supporting units). This does however oreserve the distinction between the modifier and the number of supporting units. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Mark G Fry
Signifer
Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017 Messages: 337
Localisation: Bristol, UK
|
Posté le: Dim Juil 09, 2023 2:43 pm Sujet du message: |
|
KevinD a écrit: | The max support is +3, not 3 units.
The rules on p 58 say that max (modifier);is “+3†- clearly this +3 refers to a modifier and not number of modifying units as you can speak about +3 to a modifier not would not refer to 3 modifying units as +3, you would say 3 units instead.
Thus to me it is clear that 5 of more light units firing in support give the primary shooter a +3 modifier.
I would also refer you to page 59 where it discusses four supporting light units (although admittedly not five or more such supporting units). This does however oreserve the distinction between the modifier and the number of supporting units. |
A very good point and I now feel more comfortable we did indeed play it correctly - many thanks |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Mark G Fry
Signifer
Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017 Messages: 337
Localisation: Bristol, UK
|
Posté le: Mar Juil 11, 2023 2:59 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Please note that the outcome of this rules query is being 'contested' on the French Rules Forum thread.
It would be good to have an official ruling please.
Many thanks
Mark |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Neep
Légionaire
Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023 Messages: 138
|
Posté le: Mar Juil 11, 2023 8:56 pm Sujet du message: |
|
There is an obvious error on page 59. Shooting overhead, 5th bullet, last line:
Citation: | The shooting range is measured from the front or rear edge of the main shooting unit. |
It should say:
Citation: | The shooting range is measured from the front or rear edge of the units shot over. |
Also, the section Light troops and shooting support on the same page is unnecessarily detailed and in the wrong place. It should be a simple bullet on page 57 in the Multiple shooters at the same target section. Light troops count only as +½ bonus (rounded up).
Otherwise, the text is pretty unambiguous, and it is unclear what difficulties would not be resolved after discussion.
Dernière édition par Neep le Mer Juil 12, 2023 1:24 am; édité 1 fois |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Mar Juil 11, 2023 11:22 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Guys, I agree with Lionelrus on the French forum.
Assume the diagram represents a block of six LC arcÂ
ABC
DEF
If units A and C were missing, the three units in the rear would still provide support because D and F are in corner contact and aligned (facing in exactly the same direction) with unit B. (P59)
This definition is slightly different from that of units in a group which must be in contact with adjacent units of the group by their lateral or frontal edges and with one corner of their frontal edge. (P10)
So a maximum of six LC can shoot at a single target, one shooting and five supporting giving +3. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Mark G Fry
Signifer
Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017 Messages: 337
Localisation: Bristol, UK
|
Posté le: Mer Juil 12, 2023 8:33 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Ramses II a écrit: | Guys, I agree with Lionelrus on the French forum.
Assume the diagram represents a block of six LC arcÂ
ABC
DEF
If units A and C were missing, the three units in the rear would still provide support because D and F are in corner contact and aligned (facing in exactly the same direction) with unit B. (P59)
This definition is slightly different from that of units in a group which must be in contact with adjacent units of the group by their lateral or frontal edges and with one corner of their frontal edge. (P10)
So a maximum of six LC can shoot at a single target, one shooting and five supporting giving +3. |
Great
That is the way we played it
Good to have an official clarification
Thanks all
Mark |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
ALEXANDER
Vétéran
Inscrit le: 28 Déc 2021 Messages: 171
|
Posté le: Jeu Juil 13, 2023 5:17 pm Sujet du message: |
|
I am not convinced
Imagine this group ABCDEF shooting at enemies 123
123
ABC
DEF
A and C are MC bow!!
B and DEF are Lc bow
A and C would shoot at their oponents 1 and 3
AND
B would shoot with a +2 bonus for 3 supporting units |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
KevinD
Légat
Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021 Messages: 501
Localisation: Texas
|
Posté le: Jeu Juil 13, 2023 5:41 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Alexander, D & F can’t shoot as LC can only shooter over other LC they are behind, not MC. See the last bullet on p 59. Or so I see it. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4718
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Jeu Juil 13, 2023 9:44 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Mark G Fry a écrit: | Please note that the outcome of this rules query is being 'contested' on the French Rules Forum thread.
It would be good to have an official ruling please.
Many thanks
Mark |
Just applying rulebook.... _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Jeu Juil 13, 2023 10:32 pm Sujet du message: |
|
KevinD a écrit: | Alexander, D & F can’t shoot as LC can only shooter over other LC they are behind, not MC. See the last bullet on p 59. Or so I see it. |
Exactly - there are two conditions, - LC shooting over an intervening unit (that it touches and is aligned with), and
- The intervening unit being LC armed with the same weapon.
Or as Lionelrus succinctly puts it, apply the text in the rulebook.Â
|
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|