Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
Light Horse Shooting in Support Question
Page 1 sur 2 Aller à la page 1, 2  Suivante
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Auteur Message
Mark G Fry
Signifer


Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017
Messages: 337
Localisation: Bristol, UK
MessagePosté le: Mer Juil 05, 2023 2:10 pm    Sujet du message: Light Horse Shooting in Support Question Répondre en citant
Just checking to ensure we played this correctly the other evening.

6 x Light Horse bow - two ranks deep (so 3 base widths across) - front rank are Elite - back rank Ordinary (not that that effects the question).
There is only 1 target enemy unit (a MF unit) to the front of the whole Light Horse formation and all 3 front rank LH are within range & 'arc' (e.g. 1 UD to the side).

Were we correct that the central LH in the front rank, as the main shooter, gets +1 support from each of the two side LH bow (as these are each supported themselves -so count as a 'whole' support) as per page 59 shooting overhead, + the +1 support from the Ordinary LH to its rear.

Or - as per Page 58 (Shooting Resolution) only the 3 front rank LH bow elite + the Ordinary LH bow to the rear of the main shooter would count, as Page 58 states: "For each supporting unit (max +3) +1" ?

It only makes a +1 difference - but often that is enough to get the casualty Shocked

Many thanks
Mark
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
lionelrus
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009
Messages: 4718
Localisation: paris
MessagePosté le: Mer Juil 05, 2023 5:09 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Correct, you are!
_________________
"Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
KevinD
Légat


Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021
Messages: 501
Localisation: Texas
MessagePosté le: Mer Juil 05, 2023 8:14 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Six LC firing at the enemy is -1 (LC shooting) +1 (2nd LC) +1 (3rd and 4th LC) +1 (5th and 6th LC) for a total of +2. Maybe another +1 for Elite who roll 1, 2 or 3.

Note that the front rank LC do not shoot one base width to either side, but rather 360 degrees as LC have a unique way of figuring out which units are in arc.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Neep
Légionaire


Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023
Messages: 138
MessagePosté le: Mer Juil 05, 2023 9:44 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Strickly speaking, all 6 are shooting, one main from the front rank and the other five in support. As they are all LH they count 1/2 rounded up so 5/2 rounded up or +3. So total -1(LH shooting)+3(support) or +2 to an Elite boosted die. The general rule changed by a specific rule is typical of AdlG. Tread lightly.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mark G Fry
Signifer


Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017
Messages: 337
Localisation: Bristol, UK
MessagePosté le: Sam Juil 08, 2023 4:04 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Neep a écrit:
Strickly speaking, all 6 are shooting, one main from the front rank and the other five in support. As they are all LH they count 1/2 rounded up so 5/2 rounded up or +3. So total -1(LH shooting)+3(support) or +2 to an Elite boosted die. The general rule changed by a specific rule is typical of AdlG. Tread lightly.


My/our concern was the rule (on page 58 ) that states that a single shooter can only be supported by +3 other shooters.
So the fact that in this instance there are 5 shooters supporting seemed to be wrong.
Although, the outside rear ranks are 'supporting' the front ranks that are also supporting.

Anyway ... if we played it right & I am happy to hear we did, that is a good thing.
Thanks
Mark
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
KevinD
Légat


Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021
Messages: 501
Localisation: Texas
MessagePosté le: Sam Juil 08, 2023 10:17 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
The max support is +3, not 3 units.

The rules on p 58 say that max (modifier);is “+3†- clearly this +3 refers to a modifier and not number of modifying units as you can speak about +3 to a modifier not would not refer to 3 modifying units as +3, you would say 3 units instead.

Thus to me it is clear that 5 of more light units firing in support give the primary shooter a +3 modifier.

I would also refer you to page 59 where it discusses four supporting light units (although admittedly not five or more such supporting units). This does however oreserve the distinction between the modifier and the number of supporting units.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mark G Fry
Signifer


Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017
Messages: 337
Localisation: Bristol, UK
MessagePosté le: Dim Juil 09, 2023 2:43 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
KevinD a écrit:
The max support is +3, not 3 units.

The rules on p 58 say that max (modifier);is “+3†- clearly this +3 refers to a modifier and not number of modifying units as you can speak about +3 to a modifier not would not refer to 3 modifying units as +3, you would say 3 units instead.

Thus to me it is clear that 5 of more light units firing in support give the primary shooter a +3 modifier.

I would also refer you to page 59 where it discusses four supporting light units (although admittedly not five or more such supporting units). This does however oreserve the distinction between the modifier and the number of supporting units.


A very good point and I now feel more comfortable we did indeed play it correctly - many thanks
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mark G Fry
Signifer


Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017
Messages: 337
Localisation: Bristol, UK
MessagePosté le: Mar Juil 11, 2023 2:59 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Please note that the outcome of this rules query is being 'contested' on the French Rules Forum thread.

It would be good to have an official ruling please.

Many thanks
Mark
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Neep
Légionaire


Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023
Messages: 138
MessagePosté le: Mar Juil 11, 2023 8:56 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
There is an obvious error on page 59. Shooting overhead, 5th bullet, last line:
Citation:
The shooting range is measured from the front or rear edge of the main shooting unit.

It should say:
Citation:
The shooting range is measured from the front or rear edge of the units shot over.


Also, the section Light troops and shooting support on the same page is unnecessarily detailed and in the wrong place. It should be a simple bullet on page 57 in the Multiple shooters at the same target section. Light troops count only as +½ bonus (rounded up).

Otherwise, the text is pretty unambiguous, and it is unclear what difficulties would not be resolved after discussion.


Dernière édition par Neep le Mer Juil 12, 2023 1:24 am; édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Mar Juil 11, 2023 11:22 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Guys, I agree with Lionelrus on the French forum.

Assume the diagram represents a block of six LC arc 

ABC
DEF

If units A and C were missing, the three units in the rear would still provide support because D and F are in corner contact and aligned (facing in exactly the same direction) with unit B. (P59)

This definition is slightly different from that of units in a group which must be in contact with adjacent units of the group by their lateral or frontal edges and with one corner of their frontal edge. (P10)

So a maximum of six LC can shoot at a single target, one shooting and five supporting giving +3. 
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mark G Fry
Signifer


Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017
Messages: 337
Localisation: Bristol, UK
MessagePosté le: Mer Juil 12, 2023 8:33 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Ramses II a écrit:
Guys, I agree with Lionelrus on the French forum.

Assume the diagram represents a block of six LC arc 

ABC
DEF

If units A and C were missing, the three units in the rear would still provide support because D and F are in corner contact and aligned (facing in exactly the same direction) with unit B. (P59)

This definition is slightly different from that of units in a group which must be in contact with adjacent units of the group by their lateral or frontal edges and with one corner of their frontal edge. (P10)

So a maximum of six LC can shoot at a single target, one shooting and five supporting giving +3. 


Great
That is the way we played it
Good to have an official clarification
Thanks all
Mark
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
ALEXANDER
Vétéran


Inscrit le: 28 Déc 2021
Messages: 171
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juil 13, 2023 5:17 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I am not convinced

Imagine this group ABCDEF shooting at enemies 123

123

ABC
DEF

A and C are MC bow!!
B and DEF are Lc bow

A and C would shoot at their oponents 1 and 3
AND
B would shoot with a +2 bonus for 3 supporting units
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
KevinD
Légat


Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021
Messages: 501
Localisation: Texas
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juil 13, 2023 5:41 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Alexander, D & F can’t shoot as LC can only shooter over other LC they are behind, not MC. See the last bullet on p 59. Or so I see it.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
lionelrus
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009
Messages: 4718
Localisation: paris
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juil 13, 2023 9:44 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Mark G Fry a écrit:
Please note that the outcome of this rules query is being 'contested' on the French Rules Forum thread.

It would be good to have an official ruling please.

Many thanks
Mark


Just applying rulebook....
_________________
"Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juil 13, 2023 10:32 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
KevinD a écrit:
Alexander, D & F can’t shoot as LC can only shooter over other LC they are behind, not MC. See the last bullet on p 59. Or so I see it.

Exactly - there are two conditions,
  • LC shooting over an intervening unit (that it touches and is aligned with), and
  • The intervening unit being LC armed with the same weapon.
Or as Lionelrus succinctly puts it, apply the text in the rulebook. 
Very Happy
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Page 1 sur 2 Aller à la page 1, 2  Suivante
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum