daveallen
Tribun
Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016
Messages: 742
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
|
 Posté le: Mer Avr 11, 2018 1:11 pm Sujet du message: More charge weirdness |
 |
Charge definition page 36:
| Citation: | | A charge is a move in which a unit contacts an enemy, which is not already in melee... |
So a move to contact the flank of an enemy already in melee is not a charge.Â
Imagine the friendly unit in melee with said enemy and hen disengages. Like so:
A
XB
Where X is an elephant and A B are cavalry
B has hit Nellie in the flank, A then disengages.Â
Nellie fights at +2 v mounted -1 for disorder =1
B fights at +1 v mounted +1 v flank -1 panic =1
I've been on this train for nearly 8 hours!
_________________
Putting the ink into incompetence |
|
babyshark
Légionaire
Inscrit le: 19 Jan 2015
Messages: 134
|
| Posté le: Mer Avr 11, 2018 2:09 pm Sujet du message: |
|
You should consider that the Nellie fights at 0 (enemy front edge in flank or rear) -1 (disorder) = -1.
Marc |
|
daveallen
Tribun
Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016
Messages: 742
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
|
| Posté le: Mer Avr 11, 2018 4:22 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Maybe I should. Don't have time for detailed explanation - see the flank factors thread for why that might not be correct.Â
Just saying 
Dave
_________________
Putting the ink into incompetence |
|
FAQ
Rechercher
Liste des Membres
Groupes d'utilisateurs
S'enregistrer
Profil
Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés
Connexion
