Auteur |
Message |
Za Otlichiye
Signifer
Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021 Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
|
Posté le: Dim Sep 19, 2021 7:04 pm Sujet du message: Is Incendiary canceled by flank or rear attack? |
|
Would only apply to El and WWg with blades, but should Incendiary be included in the abilities canceled by flank or rear attack?
Dernière édition par Za Otlichiye le Mer Sep 22, 2021 12:35 am; édité 1 fois |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
madaxeman
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014 Messages: 1468
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
|
Posté le: Dim Sep 19, 2021 7:23 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Za Otlichiye a écrit: | Would only apply to El, but should Incendiary be included in the abilities canceled by flank or rear attack? |
Incendiary is not included in the list of factors cancelled by flank or rear attacks in the list given on p63 where this rule is found, and so is not cancelled. _________________ www.madaxeman.com |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
KevinD
Légat
Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021 Messages: 500
Localisation: Texas
|
Posté le: Lun Sep 20, 2021 4:08 am Sujet du message: |
|
madaxeman a écrit: | Za Otlichiye a écrit: | Would only apply to El, but should Incendiary be included in the abilities canceled by flank or rear attack? |
Incendiary is not included in the list of factors cancelled by flank or rear attacks in the list given on p63 where this rule is found, and so is not cancelled. |
I think it’s an oversight. They are not in the list of abilities that don’t apply when flanked (2nd bullet on p. 63) but they are also not included in the list of those that still do apply (4th bullet). But was the oversight failing to include them in the 2nd or 4th bullet?
When I look at the 2nd bullet item I see they are all active effects from the unit taking an action (wielding a weapon, charging, etc.). In contrast the 4 bullet items are all passive abilities due to what is being worn (armor) or biology (big smelly beasts). To me incendiaries are more like the first category, weapons that have to be wielded to have an effect. Thus I would think they would not apply when their wielded is hit in the flank. Still I admit this is a pretty weak reed upon which to base the argument, but they have to go into one bullet or the other. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
MC_Delicatessen
Auxiliaire
Inscrit le: 30 Juil 2020 Messages: 87
|
Posté le: Lun Sep 20, 2021 5:22 am Sujet du message: |
|
I have a horse in this as I just bought incendiary dudes for various periods...
Surely this is an oversight and it should cancelled like e.g. javs? Hbark? |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Za Otlichiye
Signifer
Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021 Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
|
Posté le: Dim Oct 10, 2021 7:59 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Is it also an oversight that Incendiary does not count against Scythed Chariots?
It has a (small) range and perhaps would deter crazed beasts more than a wall of spears.
Also it is a LI weapon. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
fdunadan
Tribun
Inscrit le: 12 Juin 2009 Messages: 978
|
Posté le: Dim Oct 10, 2021 8:35 pm Sujet du message: |
|
By the way Incendiary is a shooting weapon. The effects are not counted when in close combat. _________________ Audentes fortuna iuvat. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4709
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Lun Oct 11, 2021 3:24 pm Sujet du message: |
|
fdunadan a écrit: | By the way Incendiary is a shooting weapon. The effects are not counted when in close combat. |
Absolutly, try understanding before asking.... _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Za Otlichiye
Signifer
Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021 Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
|
Posté le: Lun Oct 11, 2021 4:21 pm Sujet du message: |
|
My understanding of Citation: | Bonus of +1 for shooting and fighting against elephants and war wagons | is that it applies to both shooting and melee. If it means something else I'd welcome an explanation. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
fdunadan
Tribun
Inscrit le: 12 Juin 2009 Messages: 978
|
Posté le: Lun Oct 11, 2021 6:35 pm Sujet du message: |
|
My apologies.
Incendiary is indeed listed p19 as giving a +1 bonus against El and WWg in fighting.
It is not listed in the canceled abilities, but neither in the preserved abilities
so maybe it is an oversight?
waiting an explanation, it is logical to conserve the bonus even if flanked. (what is not forbidden is authorized) _________________ Audentes fortuna iuvat. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Za Otlichiye
Signifer
Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021 Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
|
Posté le: Lun Oct 11, 2021 7:56 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Thanks FD - my own opinion is that precedence says weapon effect bonuses are canceled.
My new question is admittedly quite speculative. Does Incendiary count against SCh?
It would seem to be a LI weapon similar to javelins and probably just as effective and furthermore costs extra.
Since it looks like Incendiary may have been forgotten in the flank attack rules, and since I believe they are anachronistic with SCh, it seems quite possible no one thought to include it.
But of course there is not much to discuss rules wise - it isn't there!
But we can still speculate.... |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
KevinD
Légat
Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021 Messages: 500
Localisation: Texas
|
Posté le: Lun Oct 11, 2021 8:18 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Za Otlichiye a écrit: | Thanks FD - my own opinion is that precedence says weapon effect bonuses are canceled.
My new question is admittedly quite speculative. Does Incendiary count against SCh?
It would seem to be a LI weapon similar to javelins and probably just as effective and furthermore costs extra.
Since it looks like Incendiary may have been forgotten in the flank attack rules, and since I believe they are anachronistic with SCh, it seems quite possible no one thought to include it.
But of course there is not much to discuss rules wise - it isn't there!
But we can still speculate.... |
Incendiary definitely does not count against SCh. There is an all inclusive list of what counts against SCh (p 16) and Incendiary is not on that list. Furthermore the only close combat Indiary does affect is vs El and WWg (p 19).
Should it? Who knows but that will have to await for v5. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4709
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Mar Oct 12, 2021 11:09 am Sujet du message: |
|
KevinD a écrit: | Za Otlichiye a écrit: | Thanks FD - my own opinion is that precedence says weapon effect bonuses are canceled.
My new question is admittedly quite speculative. Does Incendiary count against SCh?
It would seem to be a LI weapon similar to javelins and probably just as effective and furthermore costs extra.
Since it looks like Incendiary may have been forgotten in the flank attack rules, and since I believe they are anachronistic with SCh, it seems quite possible no one thought to include it.
But of course there is not much to discuss rules wise - it isn't there!
But we can still speculate.... |
Incendiary definitely does not count against SCh. There is an all inclusive list of what counts against SCh (p 16) and Incendiary is not on that list. Furthermore the only close combat Indiary does affect is vs El and WWg (p 19).
Should it? Who knows but that will have to await for v5. |
I agree with Kevin.
I have to give aplogies about incendiaries against Elephants and war wagons, as bonus counts in close fighting. I think it doesn't in capacities canceled by flank attack because we just forget it. This have to be cleared by El Kreator, until this ...
As far i 'm concerned, i don't cancel bonus. But another umpire may do. _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|