| Auteur |
Message |
Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
Zoltan
Réponses: 37
Vus: 2255
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Sam Sep 19, 2026 6:16 pm Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
At the time it routed (when the final cohesion loss was applied) the unit was being attacked on its front edge (the camels had not yet disengaged).
Thus we ignore the rule that says, “If at the t ... |
Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
Zoltan
Réponses: 37
Vus: 2255
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Sam Sep 19, 2026 6:31 am Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
Dickstick
P.9 Routed
“When a unit has lost all its cohesion points, it is routed…..It is eliminated and removed from the battlefield at the end of the current Phase.�
So a unit routed i ... |
Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
Zoltan
Réponses: 37
Vus: 2255
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Sep 18, 2026 7:38 pm Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
| P.9 makes it clear that a unit routed during the Movement phase is removed from the table at the end of that phase (last sentence). So the OP situation no longer exists once the game has moved to the ... |
Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
Zoltan
Réponses: 37
Vus: 2255
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Sep 18, 2026 6:44 pm Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
| P.9 makes it clear that a unit routed during the Movement phase is removed from the table at the end of that phase (last sentence). So the OP situation no longer exists once the game has moved to the ... |
Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
Zoltan
Réponses: 37
Vus: 2255
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Sep 18, 2026 9:32 am Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
Dickstick.
P.9 spells out that all units are always in one of three statuses:
Good order
Disordered
Routed
P.23 spells out the sequence of play in phases:
Movement
Shooting
Combat
R ... |
Sujet: Conforming units in contact |
Zoltan
Réponses: 25
Vus: 1318
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Sep 18, 2026 5:40 am Sujet: Conforming units in contact |
no
Thank you for your answer - is there a reference to the rule that covers this?
Andy
Impetuous units have an exemption from making an uncontrolled charge (p.46) if that would result in them ... |
Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
Zoltan
Réponses: 37
Vus: 2255
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Sep 04, 2026 7:48 am Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
So are you saying the rout should be done immediately in the movement phase? Ie before the break off from melee?.
No, I’m pointing out that there is a distinction between when a unit status moves ... |
Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
Zoltan
Réponses: 37
Vus: 2255
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Sep 04, 2026 12:40 am Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
Depends upon the meaning of "when Routed".
RAW p9, a unit is routed when it has lost all its cohesion points.
In Andy’s example, the rout “unit status� clearly occurs in the Moveme ... |
Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
Zoltan
Réponses: 37
Vus: 2255
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Jeu Sep 03, 2026 10:34 pm Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
There’s a time delay between:
1 Attaining the p9 unit status of “routed� in phase 1 Movement
2. Undertaking phase 4 Rout per p68.
What you do in phase 4 is determined by the situation t ... |
Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
Zoltan
Réponses: 37
Vus: 2255
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Jeu Sep 03, 2026 10:19 am Sujet: Rout direction following disengage |
At the time they were routed the medium swordsmen were also being attacked on their front.
So ignore the ‘only attacked on side or rear at time of rout turn to face’ rule as it doesn’t apply ... |
Sujet: Impetuous moving short - or are they? |
Zoltan
Réponses: 14
Vus: 983
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mer Sep 02, 2026 2:57 pm Sujet: Impetuous moving short - or are they? |
Dear Psiloi you are overthinking this.
The rules make it clear that if a unit moves through two different terrain types, it’s Movement Allowance is that of the slower terrain.
So in the case o ... |
Sujet: Impetuous moving short - or are they? |
Zoltan
Réponses: 14
Vus: 983
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Sam Aoû 29, 2026 7:58 pm Sujet: Impetuous moving short - or are they? |
| Like a number of experienced players said on your FB post, it costs 2 CP (for the reason that Steve has explained very clearly). |
Sujet: Falkirk Summer Bash 2026 |
Zoltan
Réponses: 8
Vus: 2837
|
Forum: Tournaments and Events Posté le: Sam Aoû 22, 2026 6:54 am Sujet: Falkirk Summer Bash 2026 |
Great turnout !
(Although I am sure I will not be the only one here to be a little disappointed that there is no “People’s Popular Front of Elginâ€� (etc etc) team in the list …!)Â
Depend ... |
Sujet: Deployment and command range |
Zoltan
Réponses: 16
Vus: 1569
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Jeu Aoû 06, 2026 7:28 am Sujet: Deployment and command range |
| That’s for sending an order to move a group, not a unit. If you try to do something with a unit it of command range but part if a group not doing the action, then the unit is out of command range. D ... |
Sujet: Deployment and command range |
Zoltan
Réponses: 16
Vus: 1569
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mer Aoû 05, 2026 6:56 pm Sujet: Deployment and command range |
| P.26, left column, sentence 2. The definition of command range clearly allows for units OR groups (of units) to satisfy the requirement of being within command range. |
| |