Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
1104 résultats trouvés
Art De La Guerre Index du Forum
Auteur Message
  Sujet: LI blocking flank attack
Ramses II

Réponses: 19
Vus: 468

MessageForum: Rules question V4   Posté le: Mar Mai 27, 2025 4:24 pm   Sujet: LI blocking flank attack
Guys, I think the position of the LI is key. 
P47 says the LI must evade when contacted by a heavier enemy, unless the LI would be in a position to provide support.

Here the LI is at an angle so ...
  Sujet: LI blocking flank attack
Ramses II

Réponses: 19
Vus: 468

MessageForum: Rules question V4   Posté le: Mar Mai 27, 2025 2:12 pm   Sujet: LI blocking flank attack
I tend to agree Mike.  This is effectively the same as if unit B were not there (eg an attack on the end of a line), I think that the LI would be forced to evade being contacted by a heavier enemy (c ...
  Sujet: May a unit act in both simple support and melee support?
Ramses II

Réponses: 7
Vus: 281

MessageForum: Rules question V4   Posté le: Dim Mai 25, 2025 4:12 pm   Sujet: May a unit act in both simple support and melee support?
I am inclined towards Madaxman’s views. 
Changing the hard “or†to “and†makes more sense, and could be a slip in the translation from the French. Doing this means that the text would say ...
  Sujet: Evade
Ramses II

Réponses: 16
Vus: 539

MessageForum: Rules question V4   Posté le: Jeu Mai 22, 2025 12:18 pm   Sujet: Evade
Andy, I think we all agree that the step by step approach merely ensures that players move the unit(s) correctly. The LI would also have to evade if contacted at the end of the HC evade move rather th ...
  Sujet: Evade
Ramses II

Réponses: 16
Vus: 539

MessageForum: Rules question V4   Posté le: Mer Mai 21, 2025 3:31 pm   Sujet: Evade
As you say, this is a game, not a simulation and as such many of the mechanics are at best an abstraction. 
  Sujet: Evade
Ramses II

Réponses: 16
Vus: 539

MessageForum: Rules question V4   Posté le: Mar Mai 20, 2025 6:36 pm   Sujet: Evade
Andy, I think you have answered your own question, at least in part. 

During the evade process of the blue HC, the red LI will be contacted (it doesn’t matter when this will be) so the LI must e ...
  Sujet: Discovering an ambush
Ramses II

Réponses: 31
Vus: 2961

MessageForum: Rules question V4   Posté le: Lun Mai 05, 2025 11:14 pm   Sujet: Discovering an ambush
Not quite Neep. 
Paraphrasing that 3.5 year old thread, we said that a unit stops at 1UD when a real ambush is revealed. Otherwise if it is revealed at another point, the unit may continue its movem ...
  Sujet: Unincluded General on Flank March
Ramses II

Réponses: 1
Vus: 85

MessageForum: Rules question V4   Posté le: Sam Mai 03, 2025 6:32 am   Sujet: Unincluded General on Flank March
Check p80, Driving back a flank march. 
Players compare the number of units in each flank march, counting light units as 1/2. 
Commanders are not considered. 
  Sujet: General in ambush
Ramses II

Réponses: 20
Vus: 760

MessageForum: Rules question V4   Posté le: Mer Avr 30, 2025 12:08 pm   Sujet: General in ambush
Leaving aside the debate over the commander unit (I usually have an integral commander), an entire corps of four units in ambush is a great way to confuse the opponent. 
Remember to declare the ‘o ...
  Sujet: Does a Sponteneous charge exempt an Uncontrolled Charge?
Ramses II

Réponses: 4
Vus: 227

MessageForum: Rules question V4   Posté le: Ven Avr 11, 2025 12:01 pm   Sujet: Does a Sponteneous charge exempt an Uncontrolled Charge?
As Dickstick says, an uncontrolled charge only occurs where the impetuous unit has not received ANY orders, irrespective of the CP paid. 

Here the unit HAS received orders (for 0CP) so is not subj ...
  Sujet: Conforming into a hard flank
Ramses II

Réponses: 28
Vus: 791

MessageForum: Rules question V4   Posté le: Jeu Avr 10, 2025 12:06 am   Sujet: Conforming into a hard flank
Ok, we have now strayed far enough off-topic. 
I will pm you. 
  Sujet: Conforming into a hard flank
Ramses II

Réponses: 28
Vus: 791

MessageForum: Rules question V4   Posté le: Mer Avr 09, 2025 9:56 pm   Sujet: Conforming into a hard flank
I think we do understand each other. 
We agree that units not in contact should not be forced to enter the jaws of death - normal units need not charge, and the exception for impetuous units allows ...
  Sujet: Conforming into a hard flank
Ramses II

Réponses: 28
Vus: 791

MessageForum: Rules question V4   Posté le: Mer Avr 09, 2025 8:22 pm   Sujet: Conforming into a hard flank
Please stop referring to an uncontrolled charge. Units in contact with an enemy that conform are not considered to be charging by definition (special cases p42).

The problem with your suggestion i ...
  Sujet: Conforming into a hard flank
Ramses II

Réponses: 28
Vus: 791

MessageForum: Rules question V4   Posté le: Mer Avr 09, 2025 12:36 am   Sujet: Conforming into a hard flank
What was the author’s rationale for including an explicit jaws of death exemption for impetuous troops, who are keen to get stuck in, from making an uncontrolled charge? Because in game terms chargi ...
  Sujet: Conforming into a hard flank
Ramses II

Réponses: 28
Vus: 791

MessageForum: Rules question V4   Posté le: Mar Avr 08, 2025 10:50 pm   Sujet: Conforming into a hard flank
I sympathise with the sentiment Zoltan, but them’s the rules as they say. 

But you are correct that it will be unusual for a melee to have this result and then to be unable (or unwilling) to avo ...
 
Page 1 sur 74 Aller à la page 1, 2, 3 ... 72, 73, 74  Suivante
Toutes les heures sont au format GMT
Sauter vers: