Art De La Guerre

I believe it is 1. Page 10 says the group must end together but there are exceptions like charge and interpenetration adjustments.

I would argue that it's more than 4UD from all enemies and it's not in melee "with an enemy". but clearly we are in coin toss territory. Very Happy

Nice catch BTW.

Rallying is an order.

The question about the effect of an (unlooted) camp is just a side track.

So if you are less than 4UD from the enemy camp, can you rally for free at 3-6?

I read it as: roll to accept orders -> accept orders -> stop looting
So even a zero cost rally would stop looting. (Although it brings up the question of whether you can rally if you have no co ...

It is quite clear that impetuous units do not have to "continue" a charge if it would result in an "exception".
I must concede that it is moot if they do continue whether they ha ...

There doesn't seem to be a prohibition on a commander attaching to a unit outside their command. (Ok, this might fall into the category of "obvious oversight".) Presumably the commander move ...

Kevin, I believe 8-2d bullet is covering a group charge with impetuous units.
Consider a line of 4 impetuous Cv.
Ahead of the 2d unit is MI close in. Ahead of the 4th unit is LH at some distance.
T ...

Let's not beat on Kevin for the limitations of the chosen official forum software. It's easy enough to visualize the situation. Just remember to wrap it in code markers.

FKFKFK
LILI
LI LI*
EL ...

QUESTION: Page 42 makes it plain that corner to corner contact without the possibility of partial conformance (i.e. corner to edge or vice versa) is insufficient as a charge into melee. But is it ther ...

As I recall, in other contexts front edge contact by heavy troops is deemed required to destroy or force evasion of LI, and not simply brushing by.

The alternatives - simple support to both flanks, ...

Just musing about this - it might not be as unlikely as it would seem. Here's a scenario:

A1
B2
C

A and 1 melee inconclusively. 2 routs B and immediately turns to face C who was in m ...

The sticking point is the last sentence on the left page 60 "Support units can be either simple support or melee support". Some see that as an exclusive-or.

I do recall it coming up before, either here or on Facebook . Don't recall a conclusion.

I'm not trying to embarrass anyone.
I am trying to remind the DT how frustrating it can be on this side of the curtain.