| Auteur |
Message |
Sujet: X Montmalus - Montmeló - Barcelona, May 1st and 2nd, 2027 |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 4
Vus: 99
|
Forum: Tournaments and Events Posté le: Jeu Oct 29, 2026 12:19 pm Sujet: X Montmalus - Montmeló - Barcelona, May 1st and 2nd, 2027 |
| I am looking at it seriously, I love to chariots period, and the company is always good, so it is attractive. Â Flights are a little bit pricy, maybe as a UK public holiday weekend, but more seriously ... |
Sujet: X Montmalus - Montmeló - Barcelona, May 1st and 2nd, 2027 |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 4
Vus: 99
|
Forum: Tournaments and Events Posté le: Mer Oct 28, 2026 1:21 pm Sujet: X Montmalus - Montmeló - Barcelona, May 1st and 2nd, 2027 |
| Is the worlds bit a copy paste from last year. I thought 2027 was Scotland? |
Sujet: Question on Evade Moves |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 23
Vus: 1017
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mer Oct 21, 2026 8:28 am Sujet: Question on Evade Moves |
I really don't understand why you guys are agonising over this.
The issue is not terrain within 1UD, that is clear. It is delaying terrain further away. |
Sujet: Question on Evade Moves |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 23
Vus: 1017
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Oct 20, 2026 12:51 pm Sujet: Question on Evade Moves |
| In ADLG, p. 48, bullet point 2, a unit that begins its evade move within 1 UD cannot slide to avoid the enemy. However, logic would suggest that if it starts more than 1 UD away, it should be permitte ... |
Sujet: Conforming units in contact |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 26
Vus: 1820
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mer Sep 30, 2026 6:33 am Sujet: Conforming units in contact |
| There's a inherent danger with this type of thread. The assertion that the rules are clear and nothing further is required is contradicted by the initial question. If it reoccurs regularly, or is th ... |
Sujet: Worlds 2027 |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 7
Vus: 2000
|
Forum: Tournaments and Events Posté le: Mar Sep 29, 2026 5:07 am Sujet: Worlds 2027 |
Just done my worlds paypal, £40 to adlgworlds2027@btinternet.com
PayPal acknowledgement says i have paid William Robertson. Is that correct? |
Sujet: Conforming units in contact |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 26
Vus: 1820
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Sep 28, 2026 10:43 pm Sujet: Conforming units in contact |
Or errata
Not convinced it is needed in this case. It is unambiguous, and the view is play as written. Ie there is no exception in the rules and do you conform
On the other hand an errata woul ... |
Sujet: Conforming units in contact |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 26
Vus: 1820
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mer Sep 23, 2026 3:21 am Sujet: Conforming units in contact |
I'm also happy if this is clarified that the unit does not have to conform. Clarity is all.
Andy
Why do you think that conforming is not required? There is no response from Lionel to the fo ... |
Sujet: Speed up play by always rolling CPs right to left. |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 16
Vus: 1467
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Jeu Sep 10, 2026 4:16 pm Sujet: Speed up play by always rolling CPs right to left. |
Or perhaps we could simply let people play the game they want to play and enjoy it, rather than trying to impose our own preferred way of playing on everyone else.
Agree, reasonable sensible compro ... |
Sujet: Impetuous moving short - or are they? |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 14
Vus: 1108
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Sep 01, 2026 9:00 am Sujet: Impetuous moving short - or are they? |
| I thought that the idea of the 2cp cost was a penalty for making a clever manouvre that would be beyond these troops and their eaders. It therefore seems wrong to me to penalise them for a simple move ... |
Sujet: Impetuous moving short - or are they? |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 14
Vus: 1108
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Sep 01, 2026 3:24 am Sujet: Impetuous moving short - or are they? |
I would disagree with Steve, and say if depends
With a built up area parallel to the group all use their full move (more than 2ud, less than 3) and touch the straight edge at the same time Therefor ... |
Sujet: Unmaneuverable units in a group |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 29
Vus: 7241
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Juin 22, 2026 9:43 pm Sujet: Unmaneuverable units in a group |
And let’s not forget that Lionel in his role as a DT voice has given a clear steer to us all that this is played the way we all thought it is played here too..Â
But it is a shame that the DT c ... |
Sujet: Attached commanders |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 18
Vus: 3743
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Dim Juin 21, 2026 9:15 pm Sujet: Attached commanders |
Guys, please check p27, attached commander BP 3
BP3 only addresses "engaged" commanders, not "attached" ones - which is the nub of the OP.
My view remains that the "it& ... |
Sujet: Attached commanders |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 18
Vus: 3743
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Dim Juin 21, 2026 9:13 pm Sujet: Attached commanders |
Hi all,
Gavin - I am not sure what you are getting at, that BP does not seem to address the issue.
Tim - I agree that if the last sentence said "He" instead of "it" it would ... |
Sujet: Attached commanders |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 18
Vus: 3743
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Dim Juin 21, 2026 9:02 pm Sujet: Attached commanders |
|
| |