| Auteur |
Message |
Sujet: Conforming units in contact |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 24
Vus: 883
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mer Sep 30, 2026 6:33 am Sujet: Conforming units in contact |
| There's a inherent danger with this type of thread. The assertion that the rules are clear and nothing further is required is contradicted by the initial question. If it reoccurs regularly, or is th ... |
Sujet: Worlds 2027 |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 7
Vus: 1547
|
Forum: Tournaments and Events Posté le: Mar Sep 29, 2026 5:07 am Sujet: Worlds 2027 |
Just done my worlds paypal, £40 to adlgworlds2027@btinternet.com
PayPal acknowledgement says i have paid William Robertson. Is that correct? |
Sujet: Conforming units in contact |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 24
Vus: 883
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Sep 28, 2026 10:43 pm Sujet: Conforming units in contact |
Or errata
Not convinced it is needed in this case. It is unambiguous, and the view is play as written. Ie there is no exception in the rules and do you conform
On the other hand an errata woul ... |
Sujet: Conforming units in contact |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 24
Vus: 883
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mer Sep 23, 2026 3:21 am Sujet: Conforming units in contact |
I'm also happy if this is clarified that the unit does not have to conform. Clarity is all.
Andy
Why do you think that conforming is not required? There is no response from Lionel to the fo ... |
Sujet: Speed up play by always rolling CPs right to left. |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 16
Vus: 1090
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Jeu Sep 10, 2026 4:16 pm Sujet: Speed up play by always rolling CPs right to left. |
Or perhaps we could simply let people play the game they want to play and enjoy it, rather than trying to impose our own preferred way of playing on everyone else.
Agree, reasonable sensible compro ... |
Sujet: Impetuous moving short - or are they? |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 14
Vus: 852
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Sep 01, 2026 9:00 am Sujet: Impetuous moving short - or are they? |
| I thought that the idea of the 2cp cost was a penalty for making a clever manouvre that would be beyond these troops and their eaders. It therefore seems wrong to me to penalise them for a simple move ... |
Sujet: Impetuous moving short - or are they? |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 14
Vus: 852
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Sep 01, 2026 3:24 am Sujet: Impetuous moving short - or are they? |
I would disagree with Steve, and say if depends
With a built up area parallel to the group all use their full move (more than 2ud, less than 3) and touch the straight edge at the same time Therefor ... |
Sujet: Unmaneuverable units in a group |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 29
Vus: 6767
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Juin 22, 2026 9:43 pm Sujet: Unmaneuverable units in a group |
And let’s not forget that Lionel in his role as a DT voice has given a clear steer to us all that this is played the way we all thought it is played here too..Â
But it is a shame that the DT c ... |
Sujet: Attached commanders |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 18
Vus: 3339
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Dim Juin 21, 2026 9:15 pm Sujet: Attached commanders |
Guys, please check p27, attached commander BP 3
BP3 only addresses "engaged" commanders, not "attached" ones - which is the nub of the OP.
My view remains that the "it& ... |
Sujet: Attached commanders |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 18
Vus: 3339
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Dim Juin 21, 2026 9:13 pm Sujet: Attached commanders |
Hi all,
Gavin - I am not sure what you are getting at, that BP does not seem to address the issue.
Tim - I agree that if the last sentence said "He" instead of "it" it would ... |
Sujet: Attached commanders |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 18
Vus: 3339
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Dim Juin 21, 2026 9:02 pm Sujet: Attached commanders |
|
Sujet: Unmaneuverable units in a group |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 29
Vus: 6767
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Dim Juin 21, 2026 8:58 pm Sujet: Unmaneuverable units in a group |
Lionel this does need a tidy up for 5th edition in English.
No, it's clearly write down in the rulebook yet.
As stated, the English version is clear. However, unfortunately noone I have ever seen ... |
Sujet: ADLG; Carnforth, North Lancashire 30/31 May 2026 |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 9
Vus: 7743
|
Forum: Tournaments and Events Posté le: Dim Mai 31, 2026 3:49 pm Sujet: ADLG; Carnforth, North Lancashire 30/31 May 2026 |
Thanks everyone for the support and a great weekend. Aiming to organise again on a similar weekend next year, but avoiding UK Expo (4-6 June)
371 baroni Marco Victoire, Défaite, Victoire, Victoir ... |
Sujet: ADLG; Carnforth, North Lancashire 30/31 May 2026 |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 9
Vus: 7743
|
Forum: Tournaments and Events Posté le: Jeu Mai 28, 2026 10:38 pm Sujet: ADLG; Carnforth, North Lancashire 30/31 May 2026 |
Mike would use 130 Arab Conquest
Julian would use 131 Umayyad Arab |
Sujet: ADLG; Carnforth, North Lancashire 30/31 May 2026 |
Mike Bennett
Réponses: 9
Vus: 7743
|
Forum: Tournaments and Events Posté le: Jeu Mai 28, 2026 4:42 pm Sujet: ADLG; Carnforth, North Lancashire 30/31 May 2026 |
| The draw is as follows, based chronologically on army dates submitted. Mike and Julian will join in to increase numbers and thereby minimise the need for any FDWC clashes, and in any case there will ... |
| |